Nemesis Reborn vs Stealth
card comparison

| Stat | Nemesis Reborn | Stealth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 43 ft | 205 ft | |
| Speed | 50 mph | 80 mph | |
| Inversions | 4 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1200 rph | 1000 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 15.2 $m | 22.1 $m | |
| Vintage | 2024 | 2006 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Stealth takes it 4–2, and the 2 Nemesis Reborn does win are the whole of its case.
Nemesis Reborn is a steel Inverted Coaster (full retrack of 1994 Nemesis) coaster at Alton Towers, GB, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Stealth is a steel Accelerator Coaster coaster at Thorpe Park, GB, built by Intamin.
Both are in GB, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Stealth at 205 ft against 43 ft — in another class entirely.
- Speed goes to Stealth at 80 mph against 50 mph — a long way clear.
- Nemesis Reborn inverts 4 times against nothing at all from Stealth — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
- Throughput goes to Nemesis Reborn at 1,200 rph against 1,000 rph — well clear.
- Build Cost goes to Stealth at 22.1 $m against 15.2 $m — a long way clear.
- 18 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Stealth (2006) that banks the point, not Nemesis Reborn (2024).