Nemesis Reborn vs Spinball Whizzer


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatNemesis RebornSpinball Whizzer
Height43 ft56 ft
Speed50 mph37 mph
Inversions40
Throughputest.1200 rph950 rph
Build Costest.15.2 $m6.4 $m
Vintage20242004

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Nemesis Reborn takes it 4–2, and the 2 Spinball Whizzer does win are the whole of its case.

Nemesis Reborn is a steel Inverted Coaster (full retrack of 1994 Nemesis) coaster at Alton Towers, GB, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Spinball Whizzer is a steel Spinning Coaster (pinball theme) coaster at Alton Towers, GB, built by Maurer Rides.

Both live at Alton Towers, so this is a comparison you can settle on foot in an afternoon — and one the park itself has to answer every time someone asks which to queue for first.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Spinball Whizzer at 56 ft against 43 ft — well clear.
  • Speed goes to Nemesis Reborn at 50 mph against 37 mph — a long way clear.
  • Nemesis Reborn inverts 4 times against nothing at all from Spinball Whizzer — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
  • Throughput goes to Nemesis Reborn at 1,200 rph against 950 rph — well clear.
  • Build Cost goes to Nemesis Reborn at 15.2 $m against 6.4 $m — more than double.
  • 20 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Spinball Whizzer (2004) that banks the point, not Nemesis Reborn (2024).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set