Untamed vs Zadra
card comparison
| Stat | Untamed | Zadra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 ft | 206 ft | |
| Speed | 57 mph | 75 mph | |
| Inversions | 5 | 3 | |
| Throughputest. | 1100 rph | 1050 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 13.9 $m | 16.9 $m | |
| Vintage | 2019 | 2019 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Zadra shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.
Untamed is a hybrid IBox Track (Robin Hood conversion) coaster at Walibi Holland, NL, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Zadra is a hybrid IBox Track (ground-up) coaster at Energylandia, PL, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.
They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are hybrid-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
They are near-contemporaries — 2019 and 2019 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Zadra at 206 ft against 120 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Zadra at 75 mph against 57 mph — well clear.
- Untamed takes Inversions 5 to 3.
- Throughput goes to Untamed at 1,100 rph against 1,050 rph — ahead by a whisker.
- Build Cost goes to Zadra at 16.9 $m against 13.9 $m — well clear.
- Both opened in 2019, which makes Vintage a dead heat.