Steel Vengeance vs Untamed
card comparison
| Stat | Steel Vengeance | Untamed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 205 ft | 120 ft | |
| Speed | 74 mph | 57 mph | |
| Inversions | 4 | 5 | |
| Throughputest. | 1200 rph | 1100 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 20 $m | 13.9 $m | |
| Vintage | 2018 | 2019 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Steel Vengeance takes it 5–1, and the 1 Untamed does win is the whole of its case.
Steel Vengeance is a hybrid IBox Track (Mean Streak conversion) coaster at Cedar Point, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Untamed is a hybrid IBox Track (Robin Hood conversion) coaster at Walibi Holland, NL, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.
They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are hybrid-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
They are near-contemporaries — 2018 and 2019 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Steel Vengeance at 205 ft against 120 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Steel Vengeance at 74 mph against 57 mph — well clear.
- Untamed takes Inversions 5 to 4.
- Throughput goes to Steel Vengeance at 1,200 rph against 1,100 rph — clearly ahead.
- Build Cost goes to Steel Vengeance at 20 $m against 13.9 $m — a long way clear.
- Steel Vengeance (2018) beats Untamed (2019) to Vintage by a single season.