Kumali vs Nemesis Reborn
card comparison
| Stat | Kumali | Nemesis Reborn | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 118 ft | 43 ft | |
| Speed | 55 mph | 50 mph | |
| Inversions | 4 | 4 | |
| Throughputest. | 1125 rph | 1200 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 11 $m | 15.2 $m | |
| Vintage | 2006 | 2024 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Kumali shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.
Kumali is a steel Suspended Looping Coaster (SLC) coaster at Flamingo Land, GB, built by Vekoma. Nemesis Reborn is a steel Inverted Coaster (full retrack of 1994 Nemesis) coaster at Alton Towers, GB, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
Both are in GB, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Kumali at 118 ft against 43 ft — more than double.
- Speed goes to Kumali at 55 mph against 50 mph — clearly ahead.
- Inversions splits them not at all: both read 4.
- Throughput goes to Nemesis Reborn at 1,200 rph against 1,125 rph — clearly ahead.
- Build Cost goes to Nemesis Reborn at 15.2 $m against 11 $m — a long way clear.
- 18 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Kumali (2006) that banks the point, not Nemesis Reborn (2024).