Diamondback vs Georgia Scorcher


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatDiamondbackGeorgia Scorcher
Height230 ft107 ft
Speed81 mph54 mph
Inversions02
Throughputest.1620 rph1300 rph
Build Costest.22 $m11 $m
Vintage20091999

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Diamondback takes it 4–2, and the 2 Georgia Scorcher does win are the whole of its case.

Diamondback is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at Kings Island, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Georgia Scorcher is a steel Stand-Up Coaster coaster at Six Flags Over Georgia, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.

Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Diamondback at 230 ft against 107 ft — more than double.
  • Speed goes to Diamondback at 81 mph against 54 mph — a long way clear.
  • Georgia Scorcher inverts 2 times against nothing at all from Diamondback — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
  • Throughput goes to Diamondback at 1,620 rph against 1,300 rph — well clear.
  • Build Cost goes to Diamondback at 22 $m against 11 $m — more than double.
  • 10 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Georgia Scorcher (1999) that banks the point, not Diamondback (2009).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set