Twisted Timbers vs Wicked Cyclone


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatTwisted TimbersWicked Cyclone
Height111 ft109 ft
Speed54 mph55 mph
Inversions33
Throughputest.1150 rph1200 rph
Build Costest.12 $m10 $m
Vintage20182015

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Wicked Cyclone shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.

Twisted Timbers is a hybrid IBox Track (Hurler conversion) coaster at Kings Dominion, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Wicked Cyclone is a hybrid IBox Track (Cyclone conversion) coaster at Six Flags New England, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.

Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are hybrid-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

They are near-contemporaries — 2015 and 2018 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Twisted Timbers at 111 ft against 109 ft — all but dead level.
  • Speed goes to Wicked Cyclone at 55 mph against 54 mph — ahead by a whisker.
  • Inversions splits them not at all: both read 3.
  • Throughput goes to Wicked Cyclone at 1,200 rph against 1,150 rph — ahead by a whisker.
  • Build Cost goes to Twisted Timbers at 12 $m against 10 $m — well clear.
  • Vintage is reversed, so Wicked Cyclone's 2015 takes it from Twisted Timbers's 2018 — 3 years in it.

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set