Outlaw Run vs Steel Vengeance
card comparison
| Stat | Outlaw Run | Steel Vengeance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 107 ft | 205 ft | |
| Speed | 68 mph | 74 mph | |
| Inversions | 3 | 4 | |
| Throughputest. | 1000 rph | 1200 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 10 $m | 20 $m | |
| Vintage | 2013 | 2018 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Steel Vengeance takes it 5–1, and the 1 Outlaw Run does win is the whole of its case.
Outlaw Run is a wooden Topper Track (ground-up) coaster at Silver Dollar City, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Steel Vengeance is a hybrid IBox Track (Mean Streak conversion) coaster at Cedar Point, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.
Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
They are near-contemporaries — 2013 and 2018 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Steel Vengeance at 205 ft against 107 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Steel Vengeance at 74 mph against 68 mph — clearly ahead.
- Steel Vengeance takes Inversions 4 to 3.
- Throughput goes to Steel Vengeance at 1,200 rph against 1,000 rph — well clear.
- Build Cost goes to Steel Vengeance at 20 $m against 10 $m — more than double.
- Vintage is reversed, so Outlaw Run's 2013 takes it from Steel Vengeance's 2018 — 5 years in it.