Montu vs Shambhala
card comparison
| Stat | Montu | Shambhala | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 ft | 249 ft | |
| Speed | 60 mph | 83 mph | |
| Inversions | 7 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1710 rph | 1680 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 20 $m | 32 $m | |
| Vintage | 1996 | 2012 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Honours end even at 3–3, which is the awkward kind of matchup: whoever calls the stat decides the round.
Montu is a steel Inverted Coaster coaster at Busch Gardens Tampa Bay, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Shambhala is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at PortAventura Park, ES, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Shambhala at 249 ft against 150 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Shambhala at 83 mph against 60 mph — a long way clear.
- Montu inverts 7 times against nothing at all from Shambhala — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
- Throughput goes to Montu at 1,710 rph against 1,680 rph — all but dead level.
- Build Cost goes to Shambhala at 32 $m against 20 $m — nearly double.
- 16 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Montu (1996) that banks the point, not Shambhala (2012).