Lightning Rod vs Twisted Timbers


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatLightning RodTwisted Timbers
Height206 ft111 ft
Speed73 mph54 mph
Inversions03
Throughputest.1250 rph1150 rph
Build Costest.22 $m12 $m
Vintage20162018

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Lightning Rod takes it 5–1, and the 1 Twisted Timbers does win is the whole of its case.

Lightning Rod is a hybrid Topper Track (partially retracked with IBox) coaster at Dollywood, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Twisted Timbers is a hybrid IBox Track (Hurler conversion) coaster at Kings Dominion, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.

Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are hybrid-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

They are near-contemporaries — 2016 and 2018 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Lightning Rod at 206 ft against 111 ft — nearly double.
  • Speed goes to Lightning Rod at 73 mph against 54 mph — well clear.
  • Twisted Timbers inverts 3 times against nothing at all from Lightning Rod — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
  • Throughput goes to Lightning Rod at 1,250 rph against 1,150 rph — clearly ahead.
  • Build Cost goes to Lightning Rod at 22 $m against 12 $m — nearly double.
  • Vintage is reversed, so Lightning Rod's 2016 takes it from Twisted Timbers's 2018 — 2 years in it.

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set