Kondaa vs Millennium Force
card comparison
| Stat | Kondaa | Millennium Force | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 ft | 310 ft | |
| Speed | 70 mph | 93 mph | |
| Inversions | 0 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1080 rph | 1300 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 29.5 $m | 25 $m | |
| Vintage | 2021 | 2000 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Millennium Force takes it 4–1, and the 1 Kondaa does win is the whole of its case.
Kondaa is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Walibi Belgium, BE, built by Intamin. Millennium Force is a steel Giga Coaster coaster at Cedar Point, US, built by Intamin.
They come from the same drawing office: Intamin. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Millennium Force at 310 ft against 164 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Millennium Force at 93 mph against 70 mph — well clear.
- Inversions splits them not at all: both read 0.
- Throughput goes to Millennium Force at 1,300 rph against 1,080 rph — well clear.
- Build Cost goes to Kondaa at 29.5 $m against 25 $m — well clear.
- 21 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Millennium Force (2000) that banks the point, not Kondaa (2021).