Iron Gwazi vs Storm Chaser
card comparison
| Stat | Iron Gwazi | Storm Chaser | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 206 ft | 100 ft | |
| Speed | 76 mph | 52 mph | |
| Inversions | 3 | 3 | |
| Throughputest. | 1200 rph | 950 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 30 $m | 10 $m | |
| Vintage | 2022 | 2016 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Iron Gwazi takes it 4–1, and the 1 Storm Chaser does win is the whole of its case.
Iron Gwazi is a hybrid IBox Track (Gwazi conversion) coaster at Busch Gardens Tampa Bay, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction. Storm Chaser is a hybrid IBox Track (Twisted Twins conversion) coaster at Kentucky Kingdom, US, built by Rocky Mountain Construction.
Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
They come from the same drawing office: Rocky Mountain Construction. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are hybrid-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Iron Gwazi at 206 ft against 100 ft — more than double.
- Speed goes to Iron Gwazi at 76 mph against 52 mph — a long way clear.
- Inversions splits them not at all: both read 3.
- Throughput goes to Iron Gwazi at 1,200 rph against 950 rph — well clear.
- Build Cost goes to Iron Gwazi at 30 $m against 10 $m — in another class entirely.
- Vintage is reversed, so Storm Chaser's 2016 takes it from Iron Gwazi's 2022 — 6 years in it.