Hyperion vs Katun
card comparison

| Stat | Hyperion | Katun | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 253 ft | 164 ft | |
| Speed | 88 mph | 65 mph | |
| Inversions | 1 | 6 | |
| Throughputest. | 1300 rph | 1700 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 29.5 $m | 18 $m | |
| Vintage | 2018 | 2000 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Honours end even at 3–3, which is the awkward kind of matchup: whoever calls the stat decides the round.
Hyperion is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Energylandia, PL, built by Intamin. Katun is a steel Inverted Coaster coaster at Mirabilandia, IT, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Hyperion at 253 ft against 164 ft — a long way clear.
- Speed goes to Hyperion at 88 mph against 65 mph — a long way clear.
- Katun takes Inversions 6 to 1.
- Throughput goes to Katun at 1,700 rph against 1,300 rph — well clear.
- Build Cost goes to Hyperion at 29.5 $m against 18 $m — nearly double.
- 18 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Katun (2000) that banks the point, not Hyperion (2018).