Goliath vs Kondaa


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatGoliathKondaa
Height154 ft164 ft
Speed66 mph70 mph
Inversions00
Throughputest.1200 rph1080 rph
Build Costest.10.8 $m29.5 $m
Vintage20022021

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Kondaa shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.

Goliath is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Walibi Holland, NL, built by Intamin. Kondaa is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Walibi Belgium, BE, built by Intamin.

They come from the same drawing office: Intamin. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Kondaa at 164 ft against 154 ft — clearly ahead.
  • Speed goes to Kondaa at 70 mph against 66 mph — clearly ahead.
  • Inversions splits them not at all: both read 0.
  • Throughput goes to Goliath at 1,200 rph against 1,080 rph — clearly ahead.
  • Build Cost goes to Kondaa at 29.5 $m against 10.8 $m — more than double.
  • 19 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Goliath (2002) that banks the point, not Kondaa (2021).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set