Goliath vs Hyperion
card comparison

| Stat | Goliath | Hyperion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154 ft | 253 ft | |
| Speed | 66 mph | 88 mph | |
| Inversions | 0 | 1 | |
| Throughputest. | 1200 rph | 1300 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 10.8 $m | 29.5 $m | |
| Vintage | 2002 | 2018 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Hyperion takes it 5–1, and the 1 Goliath does win is the whole of its case.
Goliath is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Walibi Holland, NL, built by Intamin. Hyperion is a steel Mega Coaster coaster at Energylandia, PL, built by Intamin.
They come from the same drawing office: Intamin. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Hyperion at 253 ft against 154 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Hyperion at 88 mph against 66 mph — well clear.
- Hyperion turns upside down once; Goliath never does, so Inversions is a shut-out.
- Throughput goes to Hyperion at 1,300 rph against 1,200 rph — clearly ahead.
- Build Cost goes to Hyperion at 29.5 $m against 10.8 $m — more than double.
- 16 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Goliath (2002) that banks the point, not Hyperion (2018).