Fury 325 vs Wildfire


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatFury 325Wildfire
Height325 ft120 ft
Speed95 mph66 mph
Inversions05
Throughputest.1470 rph1024 rph
Build Costest.30 $m14 $m
Vintage20152001

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Fury 325 takes it 4–2, and the 2 Wildfire does win are the whole of its case.

Fury 325 is a steel Giga Coaster coaster at Carowinds, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Wildfire is a steel Sitting Looping Coaster coaster at Silver Dollar City, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.

Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Fury 325 at 325 ft against 120 ft — more than double.
  • Speed goes to Fury 325 at 95 mph against 66 mph — a long way clear.
  • Wildfire inverts 5 times against nothing at all from Fury 325 — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
  • Throughput goes to Fury 325 at 1,470 rph against 1,024 rph — a long way clear.
  • Build Cost goes to Fury 325 at 30 $m against 14 $m — more than double.
  • 14 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Wildfire (2001) that banks the point, not Fury 325 (2015).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set