Fury 325 vs Silver Star


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatFury 325Silver Star
Height325 ft240 ft
Speed95 mph79 mph
Inversions00
Throughputest.1470 rph1750 rph
Build Costest.30 $m12 $m
Vintage20152002

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Fury 325 shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.

Fury 325 is a steel Giga Coaster coaster at Carowinds, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Silver Star is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at Europa-Park, DE, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.

They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Fury 325 at 325 ft against 240 ft — a long way clear.
  • Speed goes to Fury 325 at 95 mph against 79 mph — well clear.
  • Inversions splits them not at all: both read 0.
  • Throughput goes to Silver Star at 1,750 rph against 1,470 rph — well clear.
  • Build Cost goes to Fury 325 at 30 $m against 12 $m — more than double.
  • 13 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Silver Star (2002) that banks the point, not Fury 325 (2015).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set