Fury 325 vs Shambhala
card comparison

| Stat | Fury 325 | Shambhala | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 325 ft | 249 ft | |
| Speed | 95 mph | 83 mph | |
| Inversions | 0 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1470 rph | 1680 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 30 $m | 32 $m | |
| Vintage | 2015 | 2012 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Shambhala shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.
Fury 325 is a steel Giga Coaster coaster at Carowinds, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Shambhala is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at PortAventura Park, ES, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
They are near-contemporaries — 2012 and 2015 — so they were competing for the same riders when they opened.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Fury 325 at 325 ft against 249 ft — well clear.
- Speed goes to Fury 325 at 95 mph against 83 mph — clearly ahead.
- Inversions splits them not at all: both read 0.
- Throughput goes to Shambhala at 1,680 rph against 1,470 rph — clearly ahead.
- Build Cost goes to Shambhala at 32 $m against 30 $m — clearly ahead.
- Vintage is reversed, so Shambhala's 2012 takes it from Fury 325's 2015 — 3 years in it.