Dragon Khan vs Silver Star
card comparison

| Stat | Dragon Khan | Silver Star | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 148 ft | 240 ft | |
| Speed | 65 mph | 79 mph | |
| Inversions | 8 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1200 rph | 1750 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 8 $m | 12 $m | |
| Vintage | 1995 | 2002 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Silver Star takes it 4–2, and the 2 Dragon Khan does win are the whole of its case.
Dragon Khan is a steel Sitting Looping Coaster coaster at PortAventura Park, ES, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Silver Star is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at Europa-Park, DE, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Silver Star at 240 ft against 148 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Silver Star at 79 mph against 65 mph — well clear.
- Dragon Khan inverts 8 times against nothing at all from Silver Star — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
- Throughput goes to Silver Star at 1,750 rph against 1,200 rph — a long way clear.
- Build Cost goes to Silver Star at 12 $m against 8 $m — a long way clear.
- Vintage is reversed, so Dragon Khan's 1995 takes it from Silver Star's 2002 — 7 years in it.