Diamondback vs Fury 325
card comparison
| Stat | Diamondback | Fury 325 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 230 ft | 325 ft | |
| Speed | 81 mph | 95 mph | |
| Inversions | 0 | 0 | |
| Throughputest. | 1620 rph | 1470 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 22 $m | 30 $m | |
| Vintage | 2009 | 2015 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Fury 325 shades it 3–2. Close enough that calling the wrong stat hands the round over.
Diamondback is a steel Hyper Coaster coaster at Kings Island, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard. Fury 325 is a steel Giga Coaster coaster at Carowinds, US, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
Both are in US, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
They come from the same drawing office: Bolliger & Mabillard. That makes the gaps below a question of brief and budget rather than engineering house style.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Fury 325 at 325 ft against 230 ft — a long way clear.
- Speed goes to Fury 325 at 95 mph against 81 mph — well clear.
- Inversions splits them not at all: both read 0.
- Throughput goes to Diamondback at 1,620 rph against 1,470 rph — clearly ahead.
- Build Cost goes to Fury 325 at 30 $m against 22 $m — a long way clear.
- Vintage is reversed, so Diamondback's 2009 takes it from Fury 325's 2015 — 6 years in it.