Corkscrew vs Katun
card comparison

| Stat | Corkscrew | Katun | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 85 ft | 164 ft | |
| Speed | 48 mph | 65 mph | |
| Inversions | 3 | 6 | |
| Throughputest. | 1800 rph | 1700 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 1.8 $m | 18 $m | |
| Vintage | 1976 | 2000 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Katun takes it 4–2, and the 2 Corkscrew does win are the whole of its case.
Corkscrew is a steel Corkscrew with vertical loop coaster at Cedar Point, US, built by Arrow Development. Katun is a steel Inverted Coaster coaster at Mirabilandia, IT, built by Bolliger & Mabillard.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Katun at 164 ft against 85 ft — nearly double.
- Speed goes to Katun at 65 mph against 48 mph — a long way clear.
- Katun takes Inversions 6 to 3.
- Throughput goes to Corkscrew at 1,800 rph against 1,700 rph — ahead by a whisker.
- Build Cost goes to Katun at 18 $m against 1.8 $m — in another class entirely.
- 24 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Corkscrew (1976) that banks the point, not Katun (2000).