Colossus vs Icon


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatColossusIcon
Height98 ft89 ft
Speed45 mph53 mph
Inversions101
Throughputest.1300 rph1000 rph
Build Costest.20.3 $m21.6 $m
Vintage20022018

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Colossus takes it 4–2, and the 2 Icon does win are the whole of its case.

Colossus is a steel 10-Inversion Coaster coaster at Thorpe Park, GB, built by Intamin. Icon is a steel Double Launch Coaster coaster at Blackpool Pleasure Beach, GB, built by Mack Rides.

Both are in GB, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Colossus at 98 ft against 89 ft — clearly ahead.
  • Speed goes to Icon at 53 mph against 45 mph — well clear.
  • Colossus takes Inversions 10 to 1.
  • Throughput goes to Colossus at 1,300 rph against 1,000 rph — well clear.
  • Build Cost goes to Icon at 21.6 $m against 20.3 $m — clearly ahead.
  • 16 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Colossus (2002) that banks the point, not Icon (2018).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set