Cobra vs Hyperia


card comparison

The back of a thoozie card.
StatCobraHyperia
Height56 ft236 ft
Speed31 mph81 mph
Inversions02
Throughputest.400 rph1000 rph
Build Costest.4.6 $m22.4 $m
Vintage20062024

Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.

The verdict

Hyperia takes it 5–1, and the 1 Cobra does win is the whole of its case.

Cobra is a steel Bobsled Coaster coaster at Paultons Park, GB, built by Gerstlauer. Hyperia is a steel Hypercoaster coaster at Thorpe Park, GB, built by Mack Rides.

Both are in GB, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.

Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.

Stat by stat

  • Height goes to Hyperia at 236 ft against 56 ft — in another class entirely.
  • Speed goes to Hyperia at 81 mph against 31 mph — more than double.
  • Hyperia inverts 2 times against nothing at all from Cobra — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
  • Throughput goes to Hyperia at 1,000 rph against 400 rph — more than double.
  • Build Cost goes to Hyperia at 22.4 $m against 4.6 $m — in another class entirely.
  • 18 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Cobra (2006) that banks the point, not Hyperia (2024).

Want to run this matchup yourself?

Build a deck and duel it out for real.

Start collecting
Back to the full set