Cobra vs Hyperia
card comparison

| Stat | Cobra | Hyperia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 56 ft | 236 ft | |
| Speed | 31 mph | 81 mph | |
| Inversions | 0 | 2 | |
| Throughputest. | 400 rph | 1000 rph | |
| Build Costest. | 4.6 $m | 22.4 $m | |
| Vintage | 2006 | 2024 |
Vintage is the reversed stat — the older ride wins. Every number here is the same one printed on the card; see /methodology for how Build Cost and Throughput are sourced.
The verdict
Hyperia takes it 5–1, and the 1 Cobra does win is the whole of its case.
Cobra is a steel Bobsled Coaster coaster at Paultons Park, GB, built by Gerstlauer. Hyperia is a steel Hypercoaster coaster at Thorpe Park, GB, built by Mack Rides.
Both are in GB, which puts them in the same conversation for anyone planning a trip there.
Both are steel-track, so nothing here is the usual steel-versus-wood argument in disguise.
Stat by stat
- Height goes to Hyperia at 236 ft against 56 ft — in another class entirely.
- Speed goes to Hyperia at 81 mph against 31 mph — more than double.
- Hyperia inverts 2 times against nothing at all from Cobra — the widest kind of gap there is on this stat.
- Throughput goes to Hyperia at 1,000 rph against 400 rph — more than double.
- Build Cost goes to Hyperia at 22.4 $m against 4.6 $m — in another class entirely.
- 18 years separate them, and because Vintage rewards age it is Cobra (2006) that banks the point, not Hyperia (2024).